|
MoD: :snore:
|
=]DoG[=: @ mc, twnz, zyx GG guys // @ ria + micro I cannot trust you or the way you play Once a cheat always a cheat and you will never convince me you are clean// [quote]Update November, 2007: Still plenty of aimbots in the wild and anti-cheat development has slowed down to only one realistic choice - UTDC. More evidence of at least one increasingly sophisticated aimbot which is much harder to identify from spec. It can adjust the rate of accuracy - sometimes identifiably through "hit/miss/hit/miss&q uot; with instant hit weapons. Tracking is much smoother and seems to have added randomness. It also switches targets by more factors than merely "closest". It works also with rockets, flak and other weapons, not just hitscan ones. To identify - well, I'm not going to give all the tells since I know aimbot writers have been using this FAQ to find ways around it, so sorry! Suffice to say that an experienced demo watcher or speccer will know something's not right. [/quote] from http://www.digdilem.org/u t/aimbot.php // db // these are my opinions not that of DoG and btw ria only peeps i like call me db to you its mr Deadboy
|